Copyright law review targets AI training and creator compensation
AI-summarised brief · reviewed before publication
New Zealand’s Cabinet has directed the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs to report by March 31, 2027, on a potential copyright framework for generative artificial intelligence. This review addresses whether AI companies should compensate creators whose works are used to train models like ChatGPT and Midjourney. The directive follows global legal battles, notably the US case Bartz v Anthropic, where Anthropic settled for US$1.5 billion after admitting to using pirated books. Despite the settlement, individual authors received only $5,000, highlighting the complexity of copyright enforcement. Experts argue New Zealand should avoid the US legal approach, which may allow wholesale copying without infringement. Instead, they recommend looking to Australia and the UK for guidance. The debate centers on balancing AI innovation with fair recompense for authors, publishers, and other creators whose intellectual property fuels these technologies. The upcoming report will shape how New Zealand regulates this rapidly evolving sector.
💡 Why It Matters
- · New Zealand’s decision to look beyond US precedents could establish a more equitable standard for digital rights globally.
- · By prioritizing creator compensation over unrestricted data scraping, the country may force AI firms to adopt sustainable licensing models.