Despite revisions, GSA’s proposed AI acquisition rule still falls short, stakeholders say
AI-summarised brief · reviewed before publication
Stakeholders at a Tuesday listening session warned that the General Services Administration’s revised AI acquisition rule contains language and contractual terms. Palantir’s U.S. government legal head Menaka Kalaskar argued the rule could force agencies to seek non‑GSA contracts for large‑language‑model services because the proposed notice‑of‑material‑change deadlines and license provisions clash with commercial practice and the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act. The rule, first issued in January and updated in June, expands definitions and scope but retains clauses on “unbiased AI principles” and government ownership of metadata, which critics say are vague. Professor Jessica Tillman noted the rule’s intent to bar AI vendors from training on government data, yet loopholes remain, leaving agencies vulnerable to indirect data exploitation. Comment runs until Aug. 3.
💡 Why It Matters
- · Agencies may be forced onto alternative procurement paths, fragmenting government AI adoption and raising compliance costs.