How OpenAI’s copyright battle with The New York Times reached a new stage
AI-summarised brief · reviewed before publication
In a new filing, The New York Times alleges that OpenAI copied millions of copyrighted articles without permission while training its AI models, accusing the firm and its partner Microsoft of “transgressive and deceptive” methods to bypass paywalls. The lawsuit, part of a broader wave of copyright actions against AI developers, seeks billions in damages and argues that OpenAI’s data collection was driven by commercial motives, citing a 2017 statement by co‑founder Greg Brockman about financial rewards. The filing also references internal ChatGPT leadership warnings that AI poses an “existential threat” to publishers. OpenAI maintains its use of publicly available material qualifies as fair use, likening it to search‑engine indexing and asserting its products do not substitute for news content. The case remains unresolved, with Microsoft distancing itself from an employee’s comment labeling the practice as theft.
💡 Why It Matters
- · The dispute could set a precedent for how AI systems may legally source copyrighted content, potentially reshaping the balance between technological innovation and media owners’ control over their work.